Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment on the sick sinus syndrome clinical observation.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 16 Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment on the sick sinus syndrome clinical observation Of: Liu Jinfeng Liu Zhiming Liu Ruxiu [Abstract]: Objective To investigate the Western treatment of sick sinus syndrome patients. METHODS 171 cases diagnosed as sick sinus syndrome were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, treatment group (90 patients) for cardiac Fumai mixture orally, the control group (81 cases) to atropine orally for 4 weeks. After treatment, the clinical symptoms compared 2 groups, 24 h ambulatory electrocardiogram and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results of clinical efficacy : The treatment group and control group, the difference was significant (P lt;0.01), 24 h ambulatory electrocardiogram: the treatment group and control group heart rate increased the total effective rate was 92% and 36%, 24 h average heart rate increased by 10 times / min and 4 times / min, 2 group difference was significant (P lt;0.01), LVEF: the treatment group and control group after treatment, a significant improvement in cardiac function (P lt;0.01). Conclusion strong Fumai Mixture can significantly improve clinical symptoms, improve heart rate and improve cardiac function, treatment of sick sinus syndrome is an effective drug. [Keywords: sick sinus syndrome, cardiac clinical Fumai Mixture Abstract: Objective To observe the difference clinical therapeutic efficacy of the Chinese herbal medicine and western medicine on sick sinus syndrome patients. Method 171 patients with sick sinus syndrome were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. 90 patients in the treatment group were given Qiangxin Fumai Mixture while the other 81 patients in the control group were given atropine. The therapeutic course was four weeks in each group. The changes of clinical manifestations, electrocardiogram (24 h Holter monitoring ECG) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared between two groups