Enameloplasty sealant pit and fissure surgery and general surgery Comparison of the effect.docVIP

Enameloplasty sealant pit and fissure surgery and general surgery Comparison of the effect.doc

  1. 1、本文档共12页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Enameloplasty sealant pit and fissure surgery and general surgery Comparison of the effect

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 12 Enameloplasty sealant pit and fissure surgery and general surgery Comparison of the effect Abstract compare enameloplasty sealant technique (enameloplasty sealant technique, EST) and ordinary sealant (conventional sealant technique, CST) closed agent retention rate and clinical efficacy. Methods: EST and CST were closed to the mandibular first permanent molars in 80, 2-year follow-up to observe the sealant off the situation. Results: EST group blocking agent did not fall off the number of 69 teeth, sealants preservation rate of 86.3%; CST group of sealers did not fall off the number of 51 teeth, sealants preservation rate of 63.7%. Conclusion: EST compared with CST can significantly improve sealant retention rate, thus enhancing the anti-caries effects. Keywords: enameloplasty sealant sealant sealant general surgery preservation rate [ABSTRACT] Objective: To compare the clinical effect and preservation rate of the sealant between the enameloplasty sealant technique (EST) group and the conventional sealant technique (CST) group. Methods: One hundred and sixty cases of the first permanent molars in the mandibula were sealed by EST and CST. The preservation rate of the sealant was produced after a follow  up of 2 years. Result: The preservation rate of the sealant was 87.3% in the EST group and 63.7% in the CST group. Conclusion: EST is superior to CST in clinical effect. [KEY WORDS] Enameloplasty sealant, technique; Conventional sealant technique; Sealant preservation rate is the enamel tooth surface fissure deep channel, is caries predilection sites, some scholars have statistical permanent tooth caries pit and fissure caries accounted for 84.7% [ 1]. Sealant can be effective in preventing caries, their effect is anti-caries in the tooth surface pit and fissure sealant retention rate within the related closed agent retention rate is often affected by the impact of tooth surface treatment technology.

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档