Nursing intervention to promote the exhaust of the Effect of gastric cancer patients.doc

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 9 Nursing intervention to promote the exhaust of the Effect of gastric cancer patients Study: High Green, red money, Songrui Mei, Yan Zhe [Abstract] Objective To analyze the exhaust of nursing intervention on the efficacy of postoperative gastric cancer. Methods observation group and control group patients, compared exhaust time, bed time, hospitalization time. Results were anal exhaust time of the observation group than the control group quickly, get out of bed ahead of time, hospital stay is reduced. Conclusions of nursing intervention on cancer patients for the exhaust effect is obvious, to a rapid recovery purposes, but also improve the patient’s psychological state and quality of life. [Keywords:] nursing intervention; gastric cancer; after discharge; Effect Gastric cancer patients because of trauma, surgery and traction, abdominal exposure, anesthesia and other factors, peristalsis disappeared, along with the gradual extension of postoperative recovery time, usually 48 ~ 72h after surgery returned to normal throughout the intestinal tract [1], starting exhaust or defecation. If more than 72h can not be independent flatus, abdominal distension is easy to cause some patients will experience nausea and vomiting not only causes patients great discomfort, but also for gastrointestinal anastomosis and have adverse effects on healing of abdominal incision and severe abdominal distension and movement is limited because the diaphragm elevation, but also can cause breathing difficulties, the inferior vena cava obstruction of blood reflux [2,3]. to promote the early resumption of gastric peristalsis after surgery, reduce postoperative complications and to reduce Patient discomfort is one of the goals of care. I Division from 2008 a new concept of rapid recovery of gastric cancer, using a variety of nursing interventions for anal cancer patients after discharge. randomly selected cases in 2007 and 2009 for all 80 cases Comparison of o