GMAT阅读之类比题-智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资 料 GMAT阅读之类比题-智课教育 GMAT阅读类比题往往是考生容易出错的地方，虽然看似简单的题 ，如果不仔细揣摩，会让很多考生痛失本来不应该丢的分数，走出考场 ，只能拍自己的脑袋，为什么要轻敌，GMAT考题本身并不是像考生想 象中那样难，但得高分却不是那么容易，所以大家在做GMAT阅读或者 任何一部分的时候，都要仔细揣摩题意。 GMAT类比题这种题型不是很常见。通常说来，它出现的方式是， 以下哪个选项的描述与原文的叙述相似。碰到这种题的时候，不要贸然 看选项，而要先注意题干的提炼。也就是原文的事例到底是怎样一种情 况。请注意阅读中的类比和GRE词汇中的类比区别在于：它只是一种大 致含义的相似，而不是精细的词义对仗。所以，它比后者容易。 In an attempt to improve the overall performance of clerical workers, many companies have introduced com- puterized performance monitoring and control systems(CPMCS) that record and report a workers computer-(5) driven activities. However, at least one study has shown that such monitoring may not be having the desired effect. In the study, researchers asked monitored clerical workers and their supervisors how assessments of productivity affected supervisors ratings of workers performance. In(10) contrast to unmonitored workers doing the same work, who without exception identified the most important element in their jobs as customer service, the monitored workers and their supervisors all responded that productivity was the critical factor in assigning ratings. This finding suggested(15) that there should have been a strong correlation between a monitored workers productivity and the overall rating the worker received. However, measures of the relationship between overall rating and individual elements of perfor- mance clearly supported the conclusion that supervisors(20) gave considerable weight to criteria such as attendance. accuracy, and indications of customer satisfaction. It is possible that productivity may be a hygiene factor. that is, if it is too low, it will hurt the overall rating. But the evidence suggests that beyond the point at(25) which productivity becomes good enough. higher productivity per se is unlikely to improve a rating. 1. According to the passage, before the final results of the