Higher Art Education Teaching Evaluation.docVIP

Higher Art Education Teaching Evaluation Summary: Arts education and teaching evaluation needs to follow certain principles, both for advancing the reform of educational evaluation provided a guiding ideology, but also for the study of a new evaluation activities are reasonable, effective delivery of the evaluation criteria, mainly including school evaluation, teacher evaluation and student evaluation. Evaluation of teaching with other disciplines is different from the training model of arts education to be more flexible; Secondly, the personnel evaluation standards are multiple, different artistic disciplines taught are not the same model. At the same time, from the development of art education and teaching evaluation of trends, evaluation of teaching art education content, methods and subjects are now more diversified, evaluation criteria and functions of more diversified, more attention to the establishment of the autonomy of art education evaluation system. Keywords: Art Education and Teaching Evaluation System Evaluation Comparative evaluation of the development trend Educational Evaluation is based on a certain educational goals, to use all feasible and effective technical means of educational activities, the effectiveness and impact of the process of value judgments. Education Evaluation experienced a “psychological test period” (19 century 50 century, 70 years -20 years), “Target Center period” (the 20th century, 30-50 years), “Standard development period” (the 20th century, 50-70 years), and “ The results agree with the period “(the 20th century, 70 years later) four stages of development. With the development of education, interest in the evaluation process, emphasizing the evaluation process for individual assessment of the possibility of more recognized, not only to evaluate the role of individual development of the construction is the mainstream of modern education evaluation, also known as “individual-oriented evaluation period” . The