- 1、本文档共2页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Rose-Tinted Ecology 英文参考文献
Book Review/Science in the Media
Rose-Tinted Ecology
Thomas Brooks
They are all very small scale: the
evidence that they can be generalized
across the landscape to deliver us a
reconciled planet is slim. Chapter
5, the one chapter which addresses
broad-scale issues—economically and
environmentally perverse subsidies—
does so from a “what-if” perspective,
rather than by reporting actual
successes. Even more worryingly, they
are heavily Americocentric: Rosenzweig
occasionally ventures outside the
United States to Europe and Israel, but
beyond that, his examples are sparse
and shaky.
The remaining ?ve chapters of
the book go from the speci?cs to
the generalities; they address the
science behind reconciliation ecology.
Rosenzweig’s argument is a simple
one, founded on a huge quantity of
empirical and theoretical evidence.
Human-driven habitat loss, he
T
his important book relates
much the most optimistic
treatise on conservation that
demonstrates, is leading inexorably
to species loss; if those species are to
survive, we must therefore allow them
access to those portions of the planet
that we have appropriated. This logic
is undeniable, even if, in a bizarre
reversal of the general mood of the
book, this science actually veers towards
pessimism. Rosenzweig’s claim that,
over evolutionary time, there is a linear
relationship between the number of
species in an area and the size of that
area is dubious (most ecologists would
argue that this relationship is a power
function, implying that relatively few
species are lost until most habitat has
been lost). And his estimate of the
extent of the planet already co-opted
by people—95%—is high (of course,
none of the planet is pristine any
longer, but numerous studies suggest
that half of the planet’s natural habitat
I have ever read: many would say
naively optimistic. I should say from
the outset that I genuinely fear that
Michael Rosenzweig’s theories and
examples are less broadly applicable
than he argues. And yet I want to
您可能关注的文档
- Role of selective V2-receptor-antagonism in septic shock a randomized, controlled, experimental study 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Serotonin via 5-HT2B Receptors in the Reinforcing Effects of MDMA in Mice 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of KIF1B Gene in HBV-Associated Viral Hepatitis 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Specific Quorum-Sensing Signals in the Regulation of Exopolysaccharide II Production within Sinorhizobium meliloti Spreading Colonies 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Spectraplakin in Drosophila Photoreceptor Morphogenesis 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of STAT3 in In Vitro Transformation Triggered by TRK Oncogenes 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Phospholipase A2 in Retrograde Transport of Ricin 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of regulatory and proinflammatory T-cell populations in allergic diseases 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Secreted Conjunctival Mucosal Cytokine and Chemokine Proteins in Different Stages of Trachomatous Disease 英文参考文献.doc
- Role of Stem Cells in Human Uterine Leiomyoma Growth 英文参考文献.doc
文档评论(0)