On the cultivation of eugenics.docVIP

On the cultivation of eugenics As one engaged in the education front 10 years, the chemical workers, very easy to test the University, and the “brand name” is not easy. Often talked with the gentlemen are good hygiene of epic proportions before the US quality of regret, can not teach “brand name” college students. Is that so? To rethink this issue, think that it is not the case, which still exists inside of how the problem of the cultivation of eugenics. First, there should develop a long-term and systematic “Pei excellent” work plan for From the high beginning, schools and teachers should develop a “Pei excellent” plan that teachers always want to exclude the idea that the stronger the students classified as “excellent”, “medium” and “poor” grade students, This division not only hurt the “in”, “poor” health initiative, it is a beginning, doomed to a high one of those so-called “eugenics” In the future is always failure. I think the plan should include the following: 1. Student placement I do not approve the placement practices of many schools, such as: “rocket class”, “Golden Bridge class”, “Golden Eagle Class” and other speed classes, so it not a sub-law students into the class again? More seriously, this points system will parents, students, and even the teachers have created a misleading, give them a psychological changes caused by unrealistic. Slow-class top student to a faster class are not the original is the best example of good results. Slow, the students were due to marked with “poor student” logo of course, a lifelong psychological sense of inferiority, while the fast, the students were due to psychological stress or other reasons are usually of no increase. Should, according to a new life in high-performance test is divided into roughly parallel to the class, but results top-notch students and the “double poor students” to make appropriate arrangements for the ratio only. Do not you see the desert wilderness, hard to find tall trees, shrubs