- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
GRE范文及赏析-Argument4-智课网
智课网GRE 备考资料
GRE 官方写作题库Argument 4
“Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams is
clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work
only part-time. Moreover, Adams’ revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and
included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch’s $144,000. Homes listed with
Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four
months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one
month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams.”
【满分范文赏析】
The author argues that Adams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty. To support this claim the author
cites statistics about the number and working hours of agents, and the number and sales prices of
homes sold by the two farms. Further, the author cites anecdotal evidence involving personal
experience with Fitch and Adams. A careful analysis reveals that this evidence lends little credib le
support for the argument.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument开头段结构,即C—E—F的开头结构。段落首先概括原文的
Conclusion ,接下来概括原文为支持其结论所引用的一系列Evidence ,最后给出开头段到正文
段的过渡句,指出原文的Flaw ,即其Evidence不能为其结论提供可靠的支持。
【本段功能】
本段作为Argument开头段,具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论,即Adams不动产
公司要优于Fitch不动产公司。本段接下来分布列举了原文为支持其结论所引用的证据——这
两家公司所拥有经纪人的数目和工作时间、二者所售出的住宅的数量和价格、以及与两家公
司接触的个人经历等等。这些信息的归纳为正文段中即将进行的具体攻击作出铺垫。
The claim is partially based on the fact that Adams has more agents than Fitch and that many
of Fitch’s agents work only part-time. There is no correlation between the number of employees,
their working hours, and the quality of their work. Without such a link, we could consider the
possibility that a smaller firm could be more effective than a larger one and, likewise, that a part-
time agen
文档评论(0)