专家权威和共识在科研基金立项评估中的应用.pdfVIP

222 2俯9 ， 45(24) Co叩uter E.崎ineering ami Applicatωω 计算机工棉与股用 专家权威不H共识在科研基金主项评估巾的应用 划香芹 1 ，陈侠 1.2 l LlU Xiang明qin ,CHEN Xi a l.2 1.忧阳航空工业学盹计算机学院，就陆 110136 2.东北大学工商管蝶学院，就陆 11∞04 l.Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering ,Shenyang l10136 ,China 2.Sch∞1 of Computer，如}阳.} of Busin串串串 Adminis位且tion ， No恍如astern Uníversíty ,Shenyang 11以泊4 ， China E-mail: lxiangqín@126.ωm LRJ Xiang附q恼，CHEN Xia.AppUcation of 刷thority 剧d co剧ensus of e碍燃rts in a储邸sment of resear由民100 project. Computer Engineering 剧d AppUca貌。础，2009， 45(24):222叩224. Abstrad: According to the appraisal problem of scientific research fund proj时It ， this paper presents a research methods.First ,it introduces the fuzzy multi呻attribute groUp deci悦。叩m必ing to the scientific research fund appraísal project ,gives the fuz.巧r 1础m guage appraisal of attribute and attribute weight ,and tω加 it into triangle fuzzy num如rs.Then ， it giv创 the consensu吕 analysís methods which each expert relativ告 d母cisio拟四making community judges.Considerin喜 the authority of experts and consensus views of expert 莎啪ps in the situation of no consensus. it gives as西棚也led al惠州thm， hased on this ,us创 the fuz均 multi-attribut告 gro呻 decision-making al事。rithm to c叙ry on row of 辑uperior of scientific research fund.Fìnally ,it explain暗 the speci负.c appraisal pr创e怖 。，f scÎentific res自革rch fund project using 础 exampl也 Key words: research fund;fuzzy lan伊锦;e appraisal; authority; consensus 铺 票:针对科研基会项黯立项评估i问题，盛会出了一科研究方法。首先，犯模糊多属性群决策列入到科研基金项湾立项评估中，给 d! .1施和属性极寰的模糊语T评价，并把1(:.串毒化为三角模糊数;然后，给出各个专家粉对决策罪羊休费j 斯的共识性分析方法，对不决 议情况综合考虑了专家权威，法和专家群体意兑共识，险，给出了集结算法，并在此基磁本利用模糊多属性群决策算法对科研基金立 项进行排优:最后，利}ij~例说嚼了科研基金项自立项的具体评估过稼。 关键词:科研总会;模糊4矗立评价:权威;共识 DOI: lO.3778/j.íssnJ∞2-8331.2栅.24.067 文章革编号: 1∞2-833 1( 2附)24呻0222阳的 文献标识码:A Jþ回分提号:曾391 1 íJ l 密 用三角模糊敬可能度方陆实现对科研基金项目捧合评判。最 盾，通过实例