腹部超声在黄疸疾病中诊断价值.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹部超声在黄疸疾病中诊断价值

腹部超声在黄疸疾病中的诊断价值   [摘要] 目的 观察并探讨腹部超声在黄疸疾病中的诊断价值。方法 此次研究对象整群选取2013年12月―2015年5月期间来该院就诊的108例黄疸病例,对其临床影像学资料展开回顾性分析。结果 以肝功能检查、手术病理诊断等为标准,入组患者中44例胆管扩张,其中7例为胆管癌,16例为胆总管结石,12例胰头癌,6例壶腹癌,3例胰头局限性炎症(1例漏诊,漏诊率0.9%)。64例胆管未扩张,其中14例为肝硬化伴腹水,32例为急性肝炎,4例为肝硬化伴肝癌,4例为急性结石性胆囊炎,2例为慢性活动性肝癌,8例为急性细菌性胆管炎(1例误诊,误诊率为0.9%)。确诊率为98.2%(106/108),胆管扩张组漏诊误诊率与胆管未扩张组相比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 在黄疸性疾病临床诊断中,腹部超声检测结果是一项重要的诊断依据,有利于临床做出诊断与鉴别性诊断 [关键词] 黄疸疾病;漏诊;确诊;腹部超声 [中图分类号] R445.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)11(c)-0189-02 [Abstract] Objective To observe and explore the diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of jaundice. Methods 108 cases of patients with jaundice treated in the hospital from December 2013 to May 2015 were selected, the clinical imaging data of which were analyzed retrospectively. According to liver function examination and surgical pathology diagnosis, among the enrolled patients, there were 44 cases with bile duct dilatation, including 7 cases with bile duct carcinoma, 16 cases with common bile duct stones, 12 cases with pancreatic carcinoma, 6 cases with ampullary carcinoma and 3 cases with pancreatic head limited inflammation (1 cases was misdiagnosed. The rate of misdiagnosis was 0.9%). There were 64 cases with bile ductnon-dilated, including 14 cases with liver cirrhosis with ascites, 32 cases with acute hepatitis, 4 cases with liver cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma, 4 cases with acute calculous cholecystitis, 2 cases with chronic active liver cancer and 8 cases with acute bacterial cholangitis (1 case was misdiagnosed. The rate of misdiagnosis was 0.9%). The diagnosis rate was 98.2% (106/108). Results The differences of misdiagnosis rate and incorrect diagnosis rate between Bile duct dilatation group and Bile duct non-dilatation group were not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion In the clinical diagnosis of jaundice, abdominal ultrasound examination is an important diagnostic basis, which is helpful for clinical diagnosis and differential diag

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档