陈忠康临帖如是说(国外英语资料).docVIP

陈忠康临帖如是说(国外英文资料) Said Chen zhongkang 1, whats going on? This is a big problem, and its hard to solve the psychology of copying. The process of copying must be examined. I think the process goes like this: First, the (starting) object -- (observation) -- the experience -- the psychological transmission -- the hand response -- to the paper Second, control -- error correction -- again the psychological experience -- strengthens memory (endpoint) Third, once again, (countless times...) This is an endless number of trial and error processes, and no copying is 100 percent close to the original post. You can say that any trace is an intention. The real appearance is in the ideal. The most significant meaning of the copy is to be able to accurately repeat the written form of the ancient people and reach the state of writing and psychological state of the ancient people. So its important to look at the shape of the word, and its a necessary step. There is no such thing as a realistic style of writing that is impossible to experience the writing and psychological state of the ancients. You cant go into the ancient world. It is another thing to be out of the ancient world. Therefore, the imitation of the so-called fakery is also considered necessary, at least as a means of examining the writers ability. God didnt exist. Any god is attached to the material foundation -- form. There is no such thing as a copy of the likeness, but there is a form of a replica that is not quite as good as that of god. In the analysis, the gods of different effects correspond to different shapes. It is commonly assumed that the likeness and likeness of the reader is a kind of false sense, a kind of psychological identity. The shape is not a surface, it is a zombie, with meat, muscle, blood and so on. The good words that touch should come out, and the Lord is born. It is a description of the ancients, but it is not necessarily accurate. 3, are generally used in copy - god concept for only 2 yuan a f