- 1、本文档共19页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Improving the evaluation of programs to improve the quality of students-毕业论文翻译
Improving the evaluation of programs to improve the quality of students
In recent years, with the deepening of quality education, we have the development of art teaching objectives, class-based design, modern technology and art integration of teaching and achieved some results. But we have overlooked or neglected the art of teaching evaluation research and practice, making art teaching evaluation lags behind. Combined with their own specific characteristics, evaluation of teachers to students in art more easily into the errors.
Misunderstanding 1: (subjective evaluation) evaluation of teachers think that the art of teaching is the evaluation of teachers, classrooms, student work is complete, teachers will be given a subjective consciousness level assessment (or excellent or jointly, or to be), marked with ‘excellent’ and they are happy But I wonder if the keystone, marked with ‘be’ saddened the hearts of poor do not know where to ... ... lead to students unable to grasp the learning information, to suppress the student’s interest and enthusiasm for the long run result in confusion emotional weariness.
Misunderstanding 2: (traditional evaluation) teachers to look at the traditional works, often the screen clean, appropriate proportion, coloring uniform as a standard, ignoring a child’s imagination, creativity and expression. At the same time the form of a single evaluation, impact student’s personality and abilities, is not conducive to students learning the subject.
Misunderstanding 3: (single assessment) teachers in addition to merely attach importance to job evaluations, performance art on the end of the assessment of the students also used a simple ‘a painting set results’ approach. Namely, to enable students to copy a painting, and then gives a result, not well reflect the quality of the requirements of many students ignored the comprehensive evaluation of art.
Based on the above, to build a comprehensive, complete, re-process, re-creative art of teaching ev
您可能关注的文档
- How to stimulate interest in mathematics and seventh grade students learn_0-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate junior high school students in the language classroom a positive initiative-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate student interest in writing-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students in Physical Education Sports Interests-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students interest in chemistry-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students interest in information technology-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students interest in language learning_0-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students interest in language learning-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students interest in learning geography-毕业论文翻译.doc
- How to stimulate students interest in learning physics-毕业论文翻译.doc
- 2024年结构工程师能力提升B卷题库(考点精练)附答案详解.docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力检测试卷(达标题)附答案详解.docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力检测试卷附答案详解(能力提升).docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力提升B卷题库(达标题)附答案详解.docx
- 2024年结构工程师测试卷及答案详解【名校卷】.docx
- 2024年结构工程师自我提分评估含答案详解【巩固】.docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力检测试卷(名校卷)附答案详解.docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力检测试卷及答案详解【基础+提升】.docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力检测试卷附完整答案详解【考点梳理】.docx
- 2024年结构工程师能力检测试卷附完整答案详解【名师系列】.docx
文档评论(0)