经皮微创钢板内固定及切开复位内固定治疗不同分型胫骨远端骨折疗效及指征.docVIP

经皮微创钢板内固定及切开复位内固定治疗不同分型胫骨远端骨折疗效及指征.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经皮微创钢板内固定及切开复位内固定治疗不同分型胫骨远端骨折疗效及指征

经皮微创钢板内固定及切开复位内固定治疗不同分型胫骨远端骨折疗效及指征[摘要] 目的:探讨经皮微创钢板内固定与切开复位内固定治疗不同分型胫骨远端骨折疗效及指征。方法:回顾性分析我院2006年10月~2010年6月收治的胫骨远端骨折未累及关节面患者80例,将采用闭合复位经皮微创钢板内固定患者36例作为研究组,将采用切开复位内固定患者44例作为对照组,比较两组患者骨折愈合时间、畸形愈合及并发症发生率。结果:研究组手术时间及术中出血量均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05),研究组A3型骨折愈合时间长于对照组,C1、C2、C3型骨折愈合时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:经皮微创钢板内固定术治疗C型胫骨远端骨折效果较好,在对B型及A1、A2型胫骨远端骨折的治疗中疗效较切开复位内固定术无明显优势,并且其对A3型胫骨远端骨折的治疗效果差于切开复位内固定术 [关键词] 胫骨远端骨折;经皮微创钢板内固定;切开复位内固定 [中图分类号] R683.423 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2011)12(a)-048-03 Clinical curative effect and indications of minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of different types of distal tibial fractures CHANG Guorong, CEN Zhicong, GAO Honghui, GAO Jianjian Department of Orthopedics, Shiling Hospital of Huadu District in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510850, China [Abstract] Objective: To discuss the efficacy and indications of minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation (MIPPO) and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of different types of distal tibial fractures. Methods: 80 cases of patients who were diagnosed with distal tibial fractures and no articular surface involved in our hospital from October 2006 to June 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. MIPPO treatment of 36 cases of patients were divided into study group, and open reduction and internal fixation treatment of 44 cases of patients were divided into control group. Fracture healing time, malunion, complication incidence of the two groups were compared. Results: Amount of bleeding loss and operative time of study group were less than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05), the healing time of A3 types fracture of study group was longer than that of the control group, and the healing time of C1, C2, C3 types fracture were shorter than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Curative effica

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档