抑郁症状个体的注意网络选择性缺失-第三军医大学学报.DOC

抑郁症状个体注意网络的特异性缺失 黄赛，冯正直 （第三军医大学护理学院心理学教研室，重庆 400038） 摘要：目的 探讨抑郁症状个体注意网络的缺失特征——是整体性缺失还是特异性缺失？方法 以贝克抑郁量表和自评抑郁量表为工具，筛选健康被试21名和抑郁症状被试22名，要求其完成注意网络测验（(Attentional Network Test, ANT)，并比较两组被试的反应时及三种注意网络成绩。 结果 根据Fan等（2002）的规则分别计算警觉、定向及执行控制的成绩，统计结果显示：（1）警觉效应和定向效应下组别主效应都不显著（ps 0.05）；（2）执行控制下的组别主效应显著（p 0.05），抑郁状态组执行控制成绩大于健康组（83 ms vs. 65 ms）；线索类型主效应也显著（p 0.05），无线索条件下执行控制得分低于双线索条件（61 ms vs. 81 ms, p 0.05），中央线索条件下执行控制得分高于空间线索条件（92 ms vs. 64 ms, p 0.05）。结论 抑郁症状个体注意网络缺失具有特异性，警觉、定向网络保持完好，而执行控制存在缺失。 关键词：注意网络；抑郁症状；缺失 The specific deficits of attentional network for depressive symptom individuals HUANG Sai, FENG Zheng-zhi (Department of Psychology, College of Nursing, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China) Abstract: Objective The present study was to investigate whether the characteristics of attentional network deficits for the depressive symptom individuals were general deficits or specific deficits? Methods We Randomly selected 21 health individuals and 22 depressive symptom individuals based on Beck depression inventory (BDI) and self rating depression scale (SDS), and asked them to complete the ANT, and then compared the reaction times (RTs) and the scores of each intentional network between groups. Results According to the rule in the study of Fan et al. (2002), we computed the alerting, orienting, and executive effect and the statistic results showed that (1) the main effect of cue type both on alerting and orienting effect were not significant, p 0.05. (2) But on executive control, the main effect of group was significant, p 0.05, suggesting that depressive symptom group had greater the score of executive control than health group (83 ms vs. 65 ms). Moreover, the main effect of cue type was also significant, p 0.05, suggesting that the score was greater for double cue conditions than for no cue condition (81 ms vs. 61 ms) and it was also greater for central cue condition than for spatial cue condition (92 ms vs. 64 ms). Conclusion The deficit