医学科研伦理-课件(下).pptVIP

Plagiarism Definition: The appropriation of another persons ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit. ORIs policy on Plagiarism excludes: the limited use of identical or nearly-identical (general) phrases that are not substantially misleading or of great significance disputes among former collaborators ORI found that the Respondent engaged in research misconduct by plagiarizing significant portions from research grant application R21 AR061881 that she had reviewed for NIAMS, NIH, and inserting that text into her submitted grant application R01 AR062378-01. Respondent also plagiarized significant portions of text from the following scientific articles and one U.S. patent application available on the Internet: Settlement: To have her research supervised; Same to other institutes; Excluded from any advisory capacity; Definitions of misconduct Research misconduct is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results, according to 42 CFR Part 93. IMPORTANT: Research misconduct does NOT include honest error or differences of opinion /grants/research_integrity/research_misconduct.htm?print=yes /2012/01/13/great-science-frauds/slide/the-baltimore-case/ The “Baltimore Case” The difference between making a mistake and committing fraud is one of intention, and it’s often a fine and obscure line. That became clear in 1989, when Congress opened hearings into alleged misconduct by Thereza Imanishi-Kari, an assistant in the lab of Nobel laureate David Baltimore at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In 1985, Baltimore and Imanisi-Kari had published a paper describing their success in injecting a mouse with a gene that altered its immune system so the animal could produce antibodies against a given bacteria or virus. The findings raised the possibility that the human immune system could be modified in the same way, enhancing our ability to ward off infections.