- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
王家梁锁定钢板与普通钢板治疗老年胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较
锁定钢板与普通钢板治疗老年胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较
摘要:目的:锁定钢板普通钢板在老年胫骨平台骨折方面的效果。方法:自2012年6月至2013年6月期间在我院治疗的老年胫骨平台骨折患者中随机抽取68例,按照随机分配与自愿的原则,将其平均分为A、B两组。A用锁定钢板法治疗,B组用普通钢板法治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:34例A组患者中有31例治疗后达优良状态,优良率为91.18%;而B组治疗后为优良的患者有18例,优良率为52.94%,A组远高于B组。A组患者骨折平均愈合时间与负重时间分别为(91.2±19.6)d与(101.2±23.9)d,均短于相应B组的(107.6±21.2)d与(119.0±31.6)d;A组术后并发症的发生比例为2.33%,也要低于B组的%。两组比较在P0.05下差异有统计学意义。结论:相比于普通钢法,锁定钢板法在治疗老年胫骨平台骨折方面具有治疗优良率高、术后并发症少,固定牢固等优势,值得临床推广应用。
关键词:锁定钢板;普通钢板;胫骨平台骨折
Comparison the Efficacy of Locking late Fixation and Ordinary Plate Fixation to Treat the Elderly Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures
Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy of locking plate fixation and ordinary plate fixation to treat the elderly patients with tibial plateau fractures. Methods: During the time of June 2012 to June 2013, 68 elderly patients with tibial plateau fractures were selected and divided into group A and group B based on the principle of voluntary and randomness. The patients in group A were treated by locking plate fixation, and the patients in group B were treated by ordinary plate fixation. To observe the treatment effects of the patients. Results: From all the 34 patients in group A, there were 31 patients get the good status after treatment, accounting for 91.18%, where there were 18 patients get the good status after treatment in group B, accounting for 52.94%, group A was higher than group B. The average fracture healing time and load time of group A were (91.2±19.6)d and (101.2±23.9)d, also higher than group B (107.6±21.2)d and (119.0±31.6)d. The complications rate of group A was 2.33%, also higher then group B’ 23.53%. And the results above were statistically significance while P0.05. Conclusion: Comparing with ordinary plate fixation, locking plate fixation has the advantages of higher good state rate, lower complications and fixation for the elderly patients with tibial plateau fractures and worthy of clinical application.
Keywords: Locking plate fixation; Ordinary plate fixation;Tibial plat
文档评论(0)