- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
标准必要专利许可费司法定价之惑 - 北大法宝
Abstract: The standard essential patent licensing fee is one of the core issues of FRAND; it is also the
focus of the parties dispute. The factors that affect the calculation of patent licensing fees are complicated.
Although the patent valuation theory has different evaluation methods for the quantitative evaluation of
patent value, but there is no recognized effective method, and the evaluation results are not recognized. Patent
standardization strengthens the complexity of assessing the value of patents and patent licensing fees. Therefore,
the court is diffi cult to determine the patent license fees in line with FRAND. The dispute of license fee does
not have the possibility of suing in the Contract Law. Antitrust lawsuits and compulsory license will not lead to
a court ruling on patent licensing fees. The court determines the license fee at the lowest rate may not meet
FRAND, and may also damage the legitimate interests of the patentee.
Key Words: standard essential patent; licensing fee; judicial pricing
FRAND
Fair,
Reasonable and NondiscriminatoryFRAND
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 基于abaqus的钢筋混凝土结构损伤塑性模型.docx VIP
- 医学课件-皮肤软组织感染.pptx VIP
- 2024年江苏赛区复赛“扬子石化杯”第38届中国化学奥林匹克(初赛)选拔赛暨化学试题含答案.pdf VIP
- 食材分拣、包装、运输、验收、售后整体配送服务方案.docx VIP
- 《华为数字化转型之道》实践经验分享试题附答案.doc
- 2025年辽宁省政府采购评审专家考试测试题及答案.docx VIP
- GB50054-2011低压配电设计规范.docx VIP
- 油漆来料检验报告.docx VIP
- GB 50054-2011 低压配电设计规范.docx VIP
- 人教版劳动教育六年级上册全册教案教学设计.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)