- 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
囊胚培养能够筛选出发育潜能上乘的胚胎可提高每个移植周期的妊娠率
玻璃化冷冻囊胚复苏移植与新鲜囊胚移植的临床结局比较摘要
目的比较新鲜囊胚移植周期与玻璃化冷冻囊胚复苏移植周期的临床结局。方法 回顾性分我院生殖中心完成的874例囊胚移植周期,其中280例新鲜囊胚移植周期(A组),594例冻融囊胚复苏移植周期(B组),比较两组临床妊娠率、种植率、妊娠结局及新生儿情况等各项指标。结果1. A组平均移植胚胎数显著高于B组,分别为1.88±0.47和1.70±0.53个;临床妊娠率及种植率A组显著低于B组(P0.05),分别为43.93%,24.96%和55.39%,40.51%。2. A组和B组的流产率、早产率、孕龄、单胎率、多胎率分别为13.82%、32.46%、(265.49±14.45)d、70.16%、29.84%和16.72%、33.84%、(264.43±16.08)d、71.86%、28.14%,均无统计学差异(P0.05)。两组中仅B组见一例异位妊娠,而A组无异位妊娠。3. A组和B组巨大儿、生长受限发生率及新生儿出生缺陷分别为6%、19.66%、1.7%和9.4%、17.82%、0.9%,两组间无统计学差异。结论 玻璃化冷冻囊胚复苏移植显著提高了囊胚移植的种植率及妊娠率,且并没有增加新生儿出生缺陷、流产率、早产率,也没有增加巨大儿和新生儿生长受限的出生比率。因此,玻璃化冻融囊胚移植技术是安全有效的,在临床上值得应用推广。Comparison of clinical outcomes between vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfer and fresh blastocyst transfer.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare fresh blastocyst transfer with vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Methods: From 2009 to 2011,a total of 874 cases of blastocyst transfer cycles were performed in our center,including 280 cases of fresh blastocyst transfer (group A), and 594 cases of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (group B). Meanwhile a retrospective analysis was performed between two groups with clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal status. Results: The number of transferred embryos in A group(1.88±0.47) was higher than that of B group(1.70±0.53), and the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of A group was significantly lower than that of B group(43.93%,24.96% and 55.39% , 40.51%,respectively, P0.05). 2. No statistical differences were found in rate of abortion, premature delivery rate, gestational age, pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate between A group(13.82%,32.46%,265.49±14.45d,70.16%,29.84%,respectively)and B group(16.72%,33.84%,264.43±16.08d,71.86%,28.14% ,respectively). In B group there was only one case of ectopic pregnancy, while in A group no ectopic pregnancy. 3. There were no statistical differences in macrosomia, growth restriction and the rate of birth defect between A grou
文档评论(0)