与李久生博主就全民共建社保基金模式的辩论（The debate on the model of universal social security fund with li jiusheng）.docVIP

与李久生博主就全民共建社保基金模式的辩论（The debate on the model of universal social security fund with li jiusheng） Debate with Li Jiusheng bloggers on the nationwide social security fund model A series of reform of state-owned enterprises based on systematic theory of social economics: Ten Nearly two months since I released a series of nine papers on the reform of state-owned enterprises on the topic Chinese blog in grassroots network has aroused widespread attention, and grassroots network users around the network of friends and hot exchange, discuss and explore together. Li Jiusheng is a grassroots network of bloggers and a theorist of Monetary Economics (usually a private research and theoretical workers can be referred to as: theorists, theoreticians and not too high to be reached, miraculous: top figure.) And the last three months, and I have been in the exchange and discussion, to discuss the theory, problems of intense debate of philosophy, politics and economics aspects, can be said to be protracted, tit, intense, battle of wits, stubborn pursuit of truth, and, today, hes really not letting this go to each other, in an unbroken line. Our focus is on the basis of the debate I: social economic thought theory system and methodology system of [universal sharing of social security funds, economic construction investment fund] model: the nature of the feasibility and raise. This universal sharing mode and social economy: the reform of state-owned enterprises, social economic system reform, the reform of social security system, deepening the reform are closely related, is a state-owned national Chinese owners return to state-owned owner, ownership and ownership status: the concrete realization, realization, and implementation of the solution way. And Li Jiushengs proposal [currency economics] that the innovation of the eight law corresponds to the PK goal. The two of us were nearly 3000 do you come to me, and the gun sword word online debate and ideological collision and confrontati