经济学与常识从三个和尚没水吃谈起-张宇燕（Economics and common sense talking about three monks without water - Zhang Yuyan）.docVIP

经济学与常识从三个和尚没水吃谈起-张宇燕（Economics and common sense talking about three monks without water - Zhang Yuyan） Sender: Economist (Economist), signal area: EconForum Title: Economics and common sense: talking about three monks without water Mail Station: BBS Mizuki Kiyoka station (Sat Jan 22, 23:13:28 2000) Economics and common sense: talking about three monks without water -- Zhang Yuyan Russell, a great English philosopher, once said, the central idea of the master of philosophy is essentially very simple. . From his expression, I was encouraged to follow the whims of the mind: since the masters central idea is extremely simple, then to it Some kind of inverse expression should also be established, that is to say, every simple fact or phenomenon also seems to be possible at the same time A place that coincides with the minds of some of the masters. I dare not say whether philosophy and economics are in essence Not far or similar, but one thing seems to be self-evident, that is, common sense has a seemingly deep sense Austrian economics theory and unpredictable. In other words, from our sense of the phenomenon is not difficult to find the key to understand the economics essence Spoon. Three monks have no water to eat, the proverbial proverb often hangs in the mouth, reveals something from an economic point of view The view is intriguing. A monk living alone when he can carry water to eat; two monks live when they can carry water to eat; And when the three monks live together, why do they end up having no water? This is where our quest unfolds. For narration Yes, we do a little bit of formal effort. Were going to be alone, two people living together and three people living together, I, Situation II and case iii.. In case I, the monks boy is undoubtedly one of the most reasonable and the most natural thing in action, because Water is a necessity for man, and there is no other choice but to pick it. On the other hand, all his labours The only possessor or possessor of water is