从一起案件谈商场附随义务责任的扩张(Talking about the expansion of duty of accessory obligation in shopping mall from a case).docVIP

从一起案件谈商场附随义务责任的扩张(Talking about the expansion of duty of accessory obligation in shopping mall from a case).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
从一起案件谈商场附随义务责任的扩张(Talking about the expansion of duty of accessory obligation in shopping mall from a case)

从一起案件谈商场附随义务责任的扩张(Talking about the expansion of duty of accessory obligation in shopping mall from a case) Talking about the expansion of duty of accessory obligation in shopping mall from a case Responsibility for the loss of a free parking case Author: Sun Jianping release time: 2010-04-20 09:15:48 [tip] points mall free parking disputes caused by theft of adjustment in our country lack of specific legal norms, so combined with Chinas social reality, according to the spirit of the legislation of our country, draw lessons from foreign precedents, re-examine the mall collateral obligation to regulate business and consumer service behavior has important significance. [case] The plaintiff Li Mousu said, June 2, 2009 at 19:20 PM, the plaintiff to the defendant at shopping, electric vehicles parked in the parking lot, a security guard at the time of the plaintiff and the defendant said hello, let the custody charge car, then went upstairs to go shopping, 20 pm, the plaintiff went downstairs ready to ride the electric car to leave the store, found their electric car when the alarm is stolen, the plaintiff and the mall official negotiations, requiring the defendant to bear the liability, the defendant was arrogant attitude, refused to take responsibility, in order to safeguard the legitimate interests of the plaintiff, the peoples Court of appeal, request the court to order the defendant to compensate the plaintiffs loss of 2100 yuan stolen electric vehicles. The defendant Dongying prestige Building Department Store Co., Ltd. argued that (1) the plaintiff did not have the right of appeal in this case, and the plaintiff made it clear in the indictment that the plaintiffs electric car was stolen, worth 2100 yuan. I think that is formed by the suspect theft criminal case, in accordance with the provisions of the Supreme Peoples Court on the scope of the criminal incidental civil action, the plaintiff has the civil rights of the time is after the inspection, public security,

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档