光微波热催化氧化效果的比较.PDF

2003 年8 月 Aug.,2003 第23 卷第8 期 Industrial Water Treatment Vol.23 No. 8 1 2 2 2 2 吕敏春, 严莲荷, 王剑虹 , 潘爱芹, 周申范 ( 1. 马鞍山钢铁公司煤焦化公司, 安徽 马鞍山 243021;2. 南京理工大学化工学院, 江苏 南京 210094) [] , , 100mL 1g/L , 1g , 1mL 30%H O ,0.07g FeSO 7H O,18 min,COD 2 2 4 2 90. 1%, COD 73.5%, , , 3 min, 100%,30min 100%, Fe- C ,, COD [] ;; [] 703. 1 [ ] A [] 1005- 829 (2003)08- 0036- 03 Comparison of photocatalysis oxidation, microwave catalysis oxidation and thermocatalysis oxidation 1 2 2 2 2 LMinchun ,Yan Lianhe ,Wang Jianhong ,Pan Aiqin ,Zhou Shenfan ( 1. The Coaltarization Corp orate, the Maanshan Iron Steel Comp any , Maanshan 243021, China; 2. Chemical Institute of Nanj ing Uni ersity fo Science Technology , Nanj ing 210094, China) Abstract: In the comparison of microwave catalysis oxidation and thermo catalysis oxidation, the same heating power is used. 100 mL of methyl orange is treated, and its concentration is 1g/ L. The experimental conditions are as follows: catalyst 1g; H O (30%) 1mL;FeSO 7H O 0.07 g;heating time 18 min. The COD removal rateof methyl orange by 2 2 4 2 microwave catalysis reaches 90. 1%,while the COD removal rate of methyl orange by thermocatalysis is only 73. 5%. Therefore,microwave catalysis is obviously better than thermocatalysis. In the comparison of microwave catalysis oxidation and photocatalysis oxidation, under similar experimental conditions, methyl orangewith low concentration is heated for 3 min by microwave catalysis, the chromaticity removal rate is nearly 100%, while by photocatalysis it takes 30 min to make 100% of removal rate. Therefore,micro