关于中国高职学生阅读中使用词义推断策略的研究.docVIP

　　关于中国高职学生阅读中使用词义推断策略的研究----英语教学论文 -- Chapter One Introduction ondorf 2003). Concerning the variation among disyllabicost grammars of contemporary English (e.g. Quirk et al. 1985) treat adjectiveparison in general terms. Scholars have also tried to stipulate some prescriptiverules to guide the choice of the parative forms. One (cf. pretty – prettier). 1.1 Significance of the Study ore Apt to Survive” published on Science Daily immediately catch attention; ore ready” is searched on Google, about 3,380,000 hits are shoocrats, Republicans Seem MoreReady to promise on Deficit Deal” is prominent. The same situation applies toother ated in the past and needs more thorough investigation, as also argued inmany prior studies that have buttressed this statement (e.g. Kyt Romaine 2000;González-Díaz 2008; Mondorf 2009).Since English adjective parison is anything but a hard and fast rule, thispaper a linguistic perspective, instead ofprescriptive grammar. During this research pro --ject, taking into account previousresearch such as that mentioned above, together y oGoogle Books Ngram Vies to present a prehensive picture ofthe ed, presenting a full morphological analysis. Inthis portant and intriguing area of English morphology and hopes to draoreattention of Chinese and other scholars to this topic in the near future. 1.2 Literature Revieain factors condition the choice bet, e.g., more proud, and the synthetic form, e.g., prouder remain to be pletelyunraveled. Previous researches (e.g. Quirk et al. 1985, Kyt Romaine 2000;González-Díaz 2008; Mondorf 2003, 2009) have approached the question in threeely from the viematical rules, diachronic research andsynchronic research. I matical rules to regulate the choice of English adjective parison. DrJohnson’s famous Dictionary (1755; included in the Yale edition of the uel Johnson, volume XVIII: Johnson on the English Language, edited by Kolband DeMaria, Jr (2005: 308)), states, “the parative degree of adjectives is formedby adding –