家族企业变革应先变革家族文化（Family business should change family culture first）.docVIP

家族企业变革应先变革家族文化（Family business should change family culture first） Organizational culture is very “ virtual ” neither visible nor touched; in reality, very few managers will pay attention to. As a result, professional institutions that engage in corporate cultural advice are generally less productive. However, this kind of ldquo can not be seen or touched. The virtual culture rdquo can be as real as the maggot bone, which makes the development of the enterprise more tangible. A private enterprise engaged in aspiring process reengineering and the management of change, but soon found that the expert teachers design is very scientific and practical system, process is completed, has become a standard file, and training and guidance are also done, the adjustment of personnel are also adjusted too, can be almost no to perform, so the mistakes are still made, the problem is still a high staff turnover rate is not high, the rate of qualified products on time and productivity are still the same, what is more, the scene of conflict and functional departments also entered a period of high executives even to pass on the scene many of the responsibility for the management of their own to the top, one can not think why? The result of the investigation is that the enterprise is a typical family enterprise. Although it has begun to take shape and developed a lot, its family culture consciousness is still very strong. In the company, almost all important management positions are friends and relatives of the boss. These ldquo to communicate in the office, the villagers are usually relatives; ” love called Xiaoming, so rarely call of duty, in the modern enterprise, the office, such as a dog, cat, egg, uncle, happy Maomao has been continual, this rich cultural atmosphere of family “ ” from time to time every moment to the exclusion of other foreign subordinate employees. People feel at all times that this is a lack of fairness and impartiality of the enterprise, but also a no future de