- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同戒烟意向男生自我效能决策平衡及转变方法探析
不同戒烟意向男生自我效能决策平衡及转变方法探析【摘要】 目的 探讨卫校现吸烟男生行为转变 阶段分布、不同戒烟意向者的转变方法及其决策平衡、自我效能感发展变化,为现吸烟男生 戒烟干预提供依据。方法 采用根据跨理 论模式设计的调查问卷或量表,对益阳卫校50名现吸烟男生进行访谈调查。结果 50名男生中有26名(52%)准备戒烟,13名(26%)为前意向戒烟者,11名(22%) 为意向戒烟者。各阶段决策平衡、自 我效能感和与认知有关的转变方法均分差异有统计学意义;由前意向期→意向期→准备期,吸烟有害的决定均分和各项认知相关转变方法均分逐步抬高,情境诱惑和吸烟有利决定均分 逐渐降低,行为相关转变方法均分保持稳定。结论 在行为转变的不同阶 段,男生情感、认知等有明显差异。戒烟干预应分阶段采用不同的措施。
【关键词】 自我评价(心理学);决策;戒烟;对比研究;学生
【中图分类号】 G 479 R 395.6 R 163 【文献标识码】 A 【文章编号】 1 000-9817(2007)10-0885-03
A Preliminary Survey on the Decisional Balance and Change of Self-efficacy of t he Boys of Different Stages who are Willing to Quit Smoking/DU Zhao-fe ng. Yiyang Health School,Yiyang(413000), Hunan Province, China
【Abstract】 ObjectiveTo explore the distribution of the stages of behavior change , the development and changes of dicisional balance, self-efficacy and the proc e sses of change used by the currently smoking male syudents of Yiyang Health Scho ol in different stages of change, and to provide basis for the intervention of c urrently smoking male students. MethodsWith a set of question naires or scales d eveloped by Transtheoretical Model of Behavior, a total of 50 currently smokingmale students were surveyed. ResultsThe sample was composed o f 26 preparers(52% ), 13 precomtemplators(26%) and 11 comtemplators(22%). Statistical significancewas found in the mean scores of the processes of change associated with cognitiv e activities, self-efficacy and decisional balance among the 3 groups. Moving f ro m precontemplation, contemplation to preparation, the mean score of every proces s of change associated with cognitive activities, and of the cons of smoking pac tice were increasing; the mean score of every process of change associated withbehavior activities remained stable, but the mean score of every situational tem ptation, and of the process of smoking practice were declining. Conclusi on As their emotions and cognition have obvious difference, different m easures should be taken in the stages of beha
文档评论(0)