- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
循证护理在预防前列腺电汽化切除术后膀胱痉挛中应用
循证护理在预防前列腺电汽化切除术后膀胱痉挛中应用[摘要] 目的:探讨循证护理在预防前列腺电汽化切除术后膀胱痉挛中的应用效果。方法:60例患者随机分为观察组(n=30)和对照组(n=30),对照组实施常规护理,观察组在此基础上实行循证护理,首先成立循证护理小组,根据临床护理经验,提出循证问题,进行文献检索,获取循证支持,根据查询实证制订护理措施应用于临床。结果:观察组膀胱痉挛发生率为6.67%,对照组为40.00%,两组比较差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组膀胱痉挛平均消失时间显著低于对照组(P<0.01);观察组满意度明显高于对照组,住院时间也明显缩短,差异均有高度统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:应用循证护理能有效预防前列腺电汽化切除术后膀胱痉挛的发生,提高护理质量。
[关键词] 循证护理;前列腺电汽化切除术;膀胱痉挛
[中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2011)11(b)-117-03
The application of evidence-based nursing prostate electricity vaporization after resection spasm bladder
ZHU Guoning
The First Department of Surgery, South Building of General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army, Peking 100048, China
[Abstract] Objective: To explore the application effect of evidence-based nursing prostate electricity vaporization after resection spasm bladder. Methods: 60 patients were randomly divided into observation group (n=30) and control group (n=30). The patients in control group were given the routine care, the patients in observation group were given the evidence-based care on the basis of routine care. Firstly, nurse group with evidence-based care was set up, evidence-based issue were provided according to clinical care experiences, then a literature search was taken to obtain evidence-based support, evidence-based measures was used in clinical care based on the query formulation of empirical. Results: Ratio of bladder spasm was 6.67% in observation group and 40.00% in control group, the difference was significant (P<0.01); the time of bladder spasms disappearing was shorter in observation group than in control group (P<0.01), the ratio of satisfaction was higher in observation group than in control group, time in hospital was shorter in observation group than in control group, the differences were significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: Evidence-based care is effective in preventing bladder spasm after prostate vaporization resection and can improve quality of nursing.
[Key words] Evidence-bas
文档评论(0)