- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
自粘接树脂水门汀在模拟根管内硬度变化
自粘接树脂水门汀在模拟根管内硬度变化[摘要] 目的 比较自粘接与通用型树脂水门汀在模拟根管内固化开始后的硬度变化。方法 将双重固化自粘接树脂水门汀A(RelyX Unicem)、B(BisCem)和双重固化通用型树脂水门汀C(DUOLINK)注满单端开口、以盖板封闭的半圆柱形不锈钢槽,将光固化灯紧贴开口端持续照射20 s,试件避光保存0.5 h后打开封闭盖板,测量树脂纵断面距照射光源1~10 mm间,以1 mm为间隔共10个深度的努氏显微硬度。试件继续避光保存24、120 h后,重复上述测量。对测量数据进行统计学分析。结果 3种材料的硬度值随模拟根管深度的增加而降低(P0.001),其中A组在5 mm及以下各深度的硬度值、B和C组在4 mm及以下各深度的硬度值差异无统计学意义。各组的硬度值在固化开始后0.5 h内增长
最多,24 h后硬度值达到或接近最大值。光照后120 h,除1 mm深处外,C组在各深度的硬度值均显著高于A和B组(P
0.001)。结论 2种类型树脂水门汀双重固化条件下的硬度值差异有统计学意义,但随时间变化的趋势基本一致。
[关键词] 自粘接树脂水门汀; 双重固化; 显微硬度; 根管
[中图分类号] R 783.1 [文献标志码] A [doi] 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2012.03.005
Hardness development of self-adhesive resin cement in simulated root canal Ding Hong1, Lan Weidong2, Meng Xiangfeng1. (1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Nanjing University Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Nanjing 210008, China; 2. Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Stomatology, Nanjing University Nanjing Stomatolo-gical Hospital, Nanjing 210008, China)
[Abstract] Objective To compare the hardness development of dual-cured self-adhesive and universal resin cement in simulated root canal. Methods The light-proof half-cylinder steel slot with one end open were syringed and filled respectively by self-adhesive A(RelyX Unicem), B(BisCem) and universal C(DUOLINK) resin cements, then the open end of slot was irradiated directly by a light unit for 20 s. Specimens were stored in a light-proof box for 0.5 h, Knoop microhardness was measured along the vertical surfaces of specimens from 1 mm to 10 mm depth at 1 mm intervals. The same measurements were taken at 24 h and 120 h after irradiation. Data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA. Results
Hardness of each group decreased with the increase of simulated canal depth(P0.001), however hardness showed no significant change between 5 mm and more depth of group A, between 4 mm and more depth of group B and C. The increase of hardness for each group was more rapid within 0.5 h after irradiation, thereafter the hardness increased gra-dual
文档评论(0)