cannabinoid cb1 receptor activation mediates the opposing effects of amphetamine on impulsive action and impulsive choice大麻素cb1受体激活介导的反对影响安非他命冲动行为和冲动的选择.pdfVIP

  • 3
  • 0
  • 约9.83万字
  • 约 12页
  • 2017-08-31 发布于上海
  • 举报

cannabinoid cb1 receptor activation mediates the opposing effects of amphetamine on impulsive action and impulsive choice大麻素cb1受体激活介导的反对影响安非他命冲动行为和冲动的选择.pdf

cannabinoid cb1 receptor activation mediates the opposing effects of amphetamine on impulsive action and impulsive choice大麻素cb1受体激活介导的反对影响安非他命冲动行为和冲动的选择

Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Activation Mediates the Opposing Effects of Amphetamine on Impulsive Action and Impulsive Choice Joost Wiskerke, Nicky Stoop, Dustin Schetters, Anton N. M. Schoffelmeer, Tommy Pattij* Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract It is well known that acute challenges with psychostimulants such as amphetamine affect impulsive behavior. We here studied the pharmacology underlying the effects of amphetamine in two rat models of impulsivity, the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) and the delayed reward task (DRT), providing measures of inhibitory control, an aspect of impulsive action, and impulsive choice, respectively. We focused on the role of cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation in amphetamine-induced impulsivity as there is evidence that acute challenges with psychostimulants activate the endogenous cannabinoid system, and CB1 receptor activity modulates impulsivity in both rodents and humans. Results showed that pretreatment with either the CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist SR141716A or the neutral CB1 receptor antagonist O-2050 dose-dependently improved baseline inhibitory control in the 5-CSRTT. Moreover, both compounds similarly attenuated amphetamine-induced inhibitory control deficits, suggesting that CB1 receptor activation by endogenously released cannabinoids mediates this aspect of impulsive action. Direct CB1 receptor activation by D9- Tetrahydrocannabinol (D9-THC) did, however, not affect inhibitory control. Although neither SR141716A nor O-2050 affected baseline impulsive choice in the DRT, both ligands completely prevented amphetamine-induc

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档