epr悖论（epr悖论）.docVIP

epr悖论（epr悖论） A paradox of A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen in 1935 to demonstrate the incompleteness of quantum mechanics is put forward. Also known as the EPR argument. EP R is the three head of a physicist name letter. This paradox involves how to understand the microscopic physical reality problem. Einstein and others believe that if a physical theory description of physical reality is complete, then each element of physical reality must have a corresponding amount of it in which the completeness criterion. When we are not any system interference, but can determine that a physical quantity value, there must be a physical reality of the elements corresponding to the physical quantity, which is criterion. They believe that quantum mechanics does not meet these criteria In the demonstration, Einstein envisioned a thought experiment to measure the particle position and momentum, then D. Bohm and simplify it for measurement of spin experiment: consider a system of two spin A particles and B 1/2 which, in a certain time, so that A and B are completely separated, no interaction. When we measured a component of a A spin, according to the law of conservation of angular momentum, to determine the predicted B values in the corresponding direction of spin. Because of the random measurement direction selection, component B spin on each direction can be determined should be predicted. So they think, according to the reality of the criterion, it should be that the B spin in each direction component at the same time with the determined values represent elements of physical reality, and in the measurement have been existed before, but the 8 components of quantum mechanics are not allowed to simultaneously determine predicted spin values, so it does not provide the complete description of physical reality. If you insist on the quantum mechanics is complete, it must be considered on the measurement of A can affect the state of B, which leads to a recognition of the ultra dista