施肥对板栗八月红生理及营养成分影响.docVIP

施肥对板栗八月红生理及营养成分影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
施肥对板栗八月红生理及营养成分影响

施肥对板栗八月红生理及营养成分影响摘要:设计6种不同施肥处理,探索不同处理对板栗(Castanea mollissima)结果性状、光合指标和主要营养成分的影响。结果表明,不同施肥处理对单位面积果枝数、每母枝果枝数、每果枝蓬数、单位面积蓬数和板栗叶片净光合速率无显著影响,不同施肥对结果性状和光合指标影响不显著的原因可能是萌芽期到花期,即3~5月的持续干旱,肥料未被板栗树充分吸收利用。对6种施肥处理的八月红主要营养成分的LSD检验和模糊分析表明,处理B和F有利于营养物质积累,C、D次之,A、E最差。尽管处理F施肥量比处理B多,但持续干旱少雨导致土壤肥料未被充分吸收,而叶面喷施肥料更能被叶片吸收利用,因此这两种施肥对罗田板栗的营养成分积累差异不显著。 关键词:板栗(Castanea mollissima);施肥处理;生理机能;营养成分 中图分类号:S664.2;S147.5 文献标识码:A 文章编号:0439-8114(2012)23-5387-04 Effects of Different Fertilization Treatments on the Physiology and Nutrients in Luotian Chestnut ‘Bayuehong’ CHENG Hua1,2,LI Lin-ling1,2,JIANG De-zhi1,2,XU Feng1,WANG Yan1,3,HU Xiao-ming1,2, CHENG Shui-yuan1,2 (1. Economic Forest Germplasm Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization of Resources of Hubei Key Laboratories, Huanggang 438000, Hubei, China; 2. Huanggang Normal University, College of Chemistry and life science, Huanggang 438000, Hubei, China; 3. Forestry Department of Hubei Province, Technology Education Department, Wuhan 430079, China) Abstract: The bearing habits, photosynthetic indexes and the main nutrients were studied and analyzed by designing of 6 different fertilization treatment programs. The result showed that there was no different significant influence among the 6 fertilization treatments and the control in leaf net photosynthetic rate, the number of fruiting branches and blumes per unit area, and the number of fruiting branches and blumes per fruit cane. The possible reason was that the drought in the period from seedling emergence stage to flowering, which lasted nearly 3 months from March to May, caused fertilizer not be fully absorbed by the chestnut tree. The results of LSD test and fuzzy analysis indicated that treatment B and F were conducive to the accumulation of nutrients, followed by C and D, the worst were treatment A and E. The fertilization dose of treatment F was more than B, but continuous dry weather led fertilizer not fully absorbed. However, fertilizer spraying on the leaf was more easily absorbed. Ther

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档