腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术临床疗效策略研讨.docVIP

腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术临床疗效策略研讨.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术临床疗效策略研讨

腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术临床疗效策略研讨  [摘要] 目的 探讨腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术的临床疗效。 方法 选取2010年9月~2012年9月间我院收治的70例行胃十二指肠穿孔手术患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,分为观察组和对照组,每组各35例,对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗,观察组采用腹腔镜胃十二指肠穿孔修补术治疗。比较两组的临床治疗效果、手术时间、住院时间、下床活动时间、术中出血量及术后并发症情况。 结果 治疗后,观察组患者临床治疗总有效率为97.14%,显著高于对照组的临床总有效率77.15%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后下床活动时间及术中出血量显著低于或少于对照组,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);观察组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组,组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。 结论 腹腔镜修补术治疗胃十二指肠穿孔临床疗效显著优于传统开腹手术,可有效缩短患者住院时间,减少手术给患者带来的伤害,降低术后并发症的发生,促使患者早日康复,且手术创伤性小,安全性高,值得临床推广和应用。  [关键词] 胃十二指肠穿孔;传统开腹手术;腹腔镜;临床疗效  [中图分类号] R656.62 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)04-0039-03  [Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical effect of gastroduodenal perforation operation. Methods The clinical data of 70 gastroduodenal perforation routine surgical patients were retrospectively analyzed from September 2010 to September 2012 in our hospital, were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 35 cases in each group, control group used traditional open surgery, observation group was treated with laparoscopic repair in the treatment of stomach and duodenal perforation. The clinical effects, the operative time, hospital stay, ambulation time, blood loss and postoperative complications of two groups were analyzed. Results After treatment, the clinical total effective rate of observation group was 97.14%,was significantly higher than the control groups 77.15%, the difference was significantly between two groups(Plt;0.05); The operative time, hospital time, postoperative ambulation time and blood loss of observation group was significantly lower or shorter than the control group, the difference was significantly between two groups(Plt;0.05). The incidence of complications of observation group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was significantly between two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair is better than traditional open surgery, can effectively shorten the hospital stay, reduce patient harm and re

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档