装在套子里的人教学反思（Teaching reflection in a man in a sleeve）.docVIP

装在套子里的人教学反思（Teaching reflection in a man in a sleeve） Teaching reflection on man in a sleeve One On the man in a case, a student raised, Belikov is a man of principle, he is strict with himself, can also ask others. I ask you: this Belikov love? Student answer: quite like it. One girl responded: well, he didnt do anything bad.. Students reading experience is undoubtedly true, but it does not mean accurate. I ask: what is Belikov principles? So, there are students suddenly see the light. I went on to add: Bie Lee Kopf did not do anything wrong subjectively, but objectively produced bad results.. So, Belikov is the old system, and consciously safeguard the old customs, from this perspective, Belikov do bad things you dont know. But the sad Belikov here: put yourself in a case, but also to others in a case, it is harm to others (students answer). The misreading of students is often the beginning of thinking deeply. Missed this generation, deny students simple and brutal views upon his students teaching reference book views, usually is self deceiving. Of course, if you can guide students to discuss the text in combination, perhaps the effect is better. Two A few days ago, the head of the teaching and research group, ye ye, talked about the dislocation of the characters and the time and space in the novel. Such a man as he was in the heyday of feudal society was perhaps an upright official. However, he was in the period of the decline of the tsarist autocracy, and the dislocation between the characters and the environment eventually led to tragedy. From the spatial perspective, Belikov himself in a case, always put ourselves in a narrow space. And he has to face the big spaces like school and whole city. Is it a misplaced space for characters to narrow space and live in real life?. Three Have students to read the teaching material, is a product of the tsarist autocracy belikov. I asked: the overthrow of the tsarist autocracy, Belikov disappeared. The student replied, no.