- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
异体骨移植修复髋关节翻修术中骨缺损中期随访
异体骨移植修复髋关节翻修术中骨缺损中期随访
作者:胡懿郃,董松庚,李康华,廖前德
【摘要】 [目的]探讨在髋关节翻修中采用异体骨修复骨缺损的中期疗效。[方法]对2000~2005年间采用异体骨修复髋关节翻修术中骨缺损而获得随访的22例22髋进行回顾性分析,其中男13例,女9例;年龄45~80岁,平均65.5岁。根据AAOS分型:髋臼缺损I型5髋,II型14髋,III型3髋;股骨缺损I型3髋,II型12髋,III型2髋,5髋无明显缺损。骨缺损重建方法:髋臼侧结构性植骨5髋;颗粒骨植骨12髋;钛网联合颗粒骨植骨5髋。股骨侧结构性植骨3髋;颗粒骨植骨12髋;钛网联合颗粒骨植骨2髋;5髋没有植骨。根据Harris评分和X线对其临床效果进行评估。[结果]术后平均随访61个月,Harris评分由翻修前平均45分增加至术后86分。1例出现伤口渗液;1例仍轻度疼痛。未见假体移位及透亮带,没有再翻修病例。[结论]全髋翻修中,根据骨缺损类型,选用相应异体骨修复骨缺损,中期随访效果满意。
【关键词】 关节成形; 髋关节; 人工假体; 翻修; 异体骨移植; 随访研究
Abstract: [Objective]To explore the intermediate result of the use of allograft grafting for bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. [Methods]A retrospective study was carried out on 22 patients(22 hips) with the use of allograft grafting for bone defects in revision of total hip arthroplasty from April 2000 to April 2005.There were 13 male and 9 female with mean age of 65.5 years.According to the AAOS system,the bone defects in acetabulum were classified into type I in 5 hips,type II 14 hips and type III 3 hips,and on the femoral side ,they were classified into type I in 3 hips,type II 12 hips and type III 2 hips.The reconstruction of bone defects in acetabulum contained structural bone graft in 5 hips,impaction bone graft in 12 hips,and metal wire mesh with bone graft in 5 hips.On the femoral side,3 hips were dealed with structural bone graft,12 hips were done with impaction bone graft,and 2 hips were repaired by metal wire mesh with bone graft.Harris Hip Score System and radiography were used to evaluate the clinical efficiency.[Results]The mean follow-up time was 61 months(37~97 months).Harris score improved from 45 points(30~65) pre-revision to 86 points(62~96) at the final follow-up.Insion drainage occurred in one hip.One patient remain slight pain in hip.No prothesis loosening, radiolucent lines were observed during the follow-up.None need to second revision.[Conclusion]During the THA revision surgery,adopting suitable allografts to repair the different types of bone defects i
文档评论(0)