抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸治疗肝癌临床探究.docVIP

抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸治疗肝癌临床探究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸治疗肝癌临床探究

抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸治疗肝癌临床探究   作者:陆启民,江文枢,韦杨年 【摘要】 目的 观察针对性抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸治疗原发性肝癌患者的疗效,了解抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸疗法治疗原发性肝癌的效果。方法 对拒绝化疗、放疗、手术或不能手术治疗的原发性肝癌患者59例,随机分为抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸治疗组(治疗组)31例和生理盐水注射液组(对照组)28例。监测治疗前和每个疗程结束后患者原发病灶、转移灶、血尿肝功能以及AFP等,同时观察患者的症状与体征改善变化。结果 治疗组31例,改善20例(65%),稳定4例(13%),无效7例(22%),总有效率78%。对照组28例,改善9例(32%),稳定3例(11%),无效13例(46%),总有效率43%。两组疗效差异有显著性(P<0.05)。两组治疗前血常规、尿常规、肝功能,AFP差异无显著性(Pgt;0.05),治疗后两组虽均有不同程度变化和改变,但差异无显著性(Pgt;0.05)。结论 原发性肝癌患者单用或手术治疗同用抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸早期有明显疗效并能提高生活质量,治疗意义大。 【关键词】 抗肝癌免疫核糖核酸;原发性肝癌 【Abstract】 Objective To understand therapeutic effect of immune ribonucleic acid(iRNA)for primary liver cancer by observing the therapeutic effect of primary hepatic cancer (PHC)patients.Methods 59 patients divided randomly the PHC patients who refused to treat by chemotherapy or radiotherapy or operation,or the PHC patients who can not treated by operation into two groups;one is the group with 31 PHC patients who treated by anti-liver cancer iRNA(iRNA group)and the other is the group with 28 PHC patients who injected just by physiological saline solution(PSS group).The primary focus,metastatic focus,hematuria,liver function and AFP etc were inspected before treatment and after each period of treatment in two groups. In the mean time,the change of signs and symptom of patients were observed.Results In the iRNA group,the signs of 20(65%) patients turned to be better,4 (13%)patients stability and 7 (23%)patients were inefficacy,the total efficiency was 78%. But in the PSS group,only 9 (32%)patients turned to be better,3(11%) patients stability and 13(46%) patients were inefficacy. And the total efficiency was just 43%. The difference of curative effect between these two groups were significant(P﹤0.05).There was no significant difference in blood routine,urine routine,liver function and AFP(P>0.05).Although there was change in varying degrees in the two groups after treatment,but there was no statistical meaning(P>0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic effect and the quality of life of the PHC patien

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档