消费者权益保护法期末案例模拟题与答案(Consumer rights and interests protection law final case simulation questions and answers).docVIP

消费者权益保护法期末案例模拟题与答案(Consumer rights and interests protection law final case simulation questions and answers).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
消费者权益保护法期末案例模拟题与答案(Consumer rights and interests protection law final case simulation questions and answers)

消费者权益保护法期末案例模拟题与答案(Consumer rights and interests protection law final case simulation questions and answers) Consumer rights and interests protection law final case simulation questions and answers Case study (81) A restaurant one day received more than 30 meals, after dinner in the afternoon, the dining staff appeared stomach pain, vomiting, diarrhea and other symptoms, more than 20 people to the hospital or drug treatment, the hospital laboratory confirmed bacterial food poisoning: the Department of industry and commerce; also found that poisoning because the restaurant operators do not pay attention to food hygiene. What is the treatment results, this legal? The restaurant shall pay the medical expenses for the dining personnel, and the administrative department for Industry and Commerce shall impose administrative fines and order them to suspend business for rectification. When a vendor sells a home computer, he declares to the consumer, we are not responsible for the legitimate copyright of the pre installed software, and any copyright dispute after the sale of the machine has nothing to do with the store.. How should the practice of the above statement be determined by the manufacturer? The statement made by the manufacturer is a standard contract, but the content of its declaration violates the legitimate rights and interests of the consumer, so the declaration is invalid. Wang bought a computer at a computer company and had trouble using it ten months later. In the three packs period of validity, after two repairs, still can not be used properly. At this point, the market has no computer of the same type. In accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, the incident should be how to deal with? A computer company should return or replace it unconditionally Held in the companys commodity fairs, consumers from exhibitors for the mark Li Hong company B booth counter to buy a third company production of household electric heating, when the leakage phenomenon

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档