常见农药喷施器械气流速度场的对比试验研究-广东农业科学.PDFVIP

东农业科学 2014 年第 10 期 181 常见农药喷施器械气流速度场的对比试验研究 袁 旺 周志艳 杨景峰 闫梦璐 徐 赛 华南农业大学工程学院/南方农业机械与装备关键技术教育部重点实验室袁 东 广州 510642 冤 要 为了研究不同农药喷施器械的气流速度场分布特性及影响规律袁揭示提高气流作用范围和实现超宽幅 高效喷施作业的工作机理袁开展了机动喷雾喷粉机尧风送式喷雾机尧热力烟雾机和悬浮管道式喷施机等 4 种常见喷 施器械的气流速度场的现场对比试验遥结果发现袁4 种机型的气流速度场差 较大袁试验中所采用的悬浮变径管道在 距离管道入口40 m 处的喷施孔仍能测量到 7 m/s 的风速袁风速衰减比小曰风送式喷雾机及喷雾喷粉机相当袁热力烟 雾机最弱遥 对比试验结果表明袁悬浮管道式喷施技术是拓宽农药喷施器械单 喷施作业覆盖范围的有效方法之一袁 通过采用悬浮管道对喷施气流进行适当的约束和导引袁可以大大提高气流速度场的作用范围袁提高喷施作业效率袁 改进喷施作业沉积效果袁减少农药资源浪费和对农田环境的污染遥 关键词 植保器械曰 农药喷施曰 气流速度场曰 对比试验 中图分类号 S224.3 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1004-874X 2014冤10-0181-04 Comparative test for the air-velocity of several pesticide spraying equipments YUAN Wang, ZHOU Zhi-yan, YANG Jing-feng, YAN Meng-lu, XU Sai (College of Enginee ring, South China A gric ultural Univ e rs ity/Key Laboratory of Key Te c hnology on A gric ultural Mac hine and Eq uip me nt, Minis try of Education, Guangz hou 510642, China) Abstract: In order to study the air -velocity distribution characteristic and its influences of different spraying equipments, and to reveal the principle to increase airflow range and spraying efficiency, a comparative test was carried out for the air-velocity of 4 kinds of plant protection equipments, including spraying and dusting machine (SDM), air-assisted sprayer (AAS), thermal fogger (TF) and aero -pipeline spray ing machine (A PSM) . T he results showed that there was significant difference in air -velocity among the 4 kinds of plant protection equipments. A ir -