Malmendier, U, Tate, G amp; J Yan (2011) Overconfidence :迪尔,U,泰特,G amp;我过分自信燕(2011年).docx

Malmendier, U, Tate, G amp; J Yan (2011) Overconfidence :迪尔,U,泰特,G amp;我过分自信燕(2011年).docx

  1. 1、本文档共39页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Malmendier,U,Tate,G

Journées de Microéconomie AppliquéeNice, 6-7 juin 2013How to not become a millionaire: Self-confidence and the Intuitive Bayesian HypothesisMuniza Askari and Louis Lévy-GarbouaAbstractWe study confidence held by subjects in their own ability to perform a difficult task before and after receiving training for this task in an easy mode. Experimental subjects were asked to estimate their subjective probability of solving anagrams under a given time limit. In a long training phase of nine rounds, a maximum of six anagrams could be solved each round in eight minutes. Subjects earned a sum of money if they solved at least two-thirds of the total number of anagrams. The task was novel but relatively easy since 89% passed the test. Successful participants were then asked to double or quits in two successive sessions of increasing difficulty. 26% passed the second level test and less than 15% passed the third level test. Those deciding quits left the game with the money already earned, while those choosing double could substantially increase their gains if they succeeded to solve increasing numbers of anagrams under the same rules in two successive levels of three rounds each. However, they would lose part of their earnings and step out of the game if they failed to reach any of these levels. The double or quits decision was repeated for those who had reached the second level. They could leave the game with their gains or engage in three final rounds in the hope of reaching the third and highest level.Three treatments were considered. The required number of anagrams was imposed in the first two treatments but differed between the treatments. In the “wall” treatment, subjects who chose double after reaching level 1 faced a wall of 10 anagrams during two sessions of three rounds each. In the “hill” treatment, they faced a rising slope of 8 anagrams during the first session and 12 anagrams during the second session. The total number of anagrams required to reach the highest lev

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ligennv1314 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档