碳酸盐岩石物理问题.doc

Carbonate Rock Physics Issues Enru Liu, Michael A. Payne, Shiyu Xu, Gregor Baechle, Christopher E. Harris / ExxonMobil Upstream ResearchCopyright 2009, International Petroleum Technology Conference This paper was prepared for presentation at the International Petroleum Technology Conference held in Doha, Qatar, 7–9 December 2009. This paper was selected for presentation by an IPTC Programme Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, aspresented, have not been reviewed by the International Petroleum Technology Conference and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarilyreflect any position of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, its officers, or members. Papers presented at IPTC are subject to publication review by Sponsor Society Committeesof IPTC. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the International Petroleum Technology Conference isprhoehribitend. bPye rmissi otn t o repperro duacse irn print is resrtiric tLeidb tori aan aIbstra, ct .of .n ot xm 8ore3 th3a,n 3i0c0 awrordos;, illuXs tr5ation-s m83a6y, no.t .be ,c foapxi e+d. The- 9abstra4ct m.ust contain conspicuous acknowledgment ofAbstract Summary Limestone and dolomite reservoirs account for approximately 50% of oil and gas production worldwide, yetseismic responses in carbonate rocks are poorly understood. Development of a carbonate rock physics model isextremely difficult because pore systems are more complex in carbonates than they are in clastics. Carbonates canhave a variety of pore types, such as moldic, vuggy, interparticle, and intraparticle. The complex pore systemcreates significant scatter in the porosity-velocity relationship, as indicated in experimental results (e.g., Anselmettiand Eberli, 2001). Pore shape appears to be the dominant factor in carbonate rock phys