- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
实施细节护理对提高急诊科患者护理满意度的探讨
精品论文 参考文献
实施细节护理对提高急诊科患者护理满意度的探讨
郭爱清 闫素蕾 袁小菊
[摘 要]目的:探讨实施细节护理对提高急诊科患者护理满意度的影响,总结护理管理经验。方法:在实施细节护理管理前,2013年6月~12月,随机抽取1785例存活患者进行患者满意度调查,纳入对照组,实施细节护理后2014年6月~12月,随机抽取1910例存活患者,纳入观察组;改进接诊时、急救时、留观时的护理策略,同时注重整个急诊停留期间心理支持;对比患者满意度评价结果、分诊与急诊停留情况。结果:观察组服务态度、护理服务及时性、护理操作、健康宣教、安全感评价高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组分诊准确率(1482/1785),低于观察组(1843/1910),差异有统计学意义(=183.83,P=0.00<0.05);对照组急诊停留时间(2.2plusmn;0.4)h高于观察组(2.0plusmn;0.4)h,差异具有统计学意义(t=1.65,P=0.00<0.05)。结论:细节护理有助于提高急诊护理效用,提高患者满意度。
[关键词]细节护理 急诊科 护理满意度
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2016.18.05
作者单位:252000,山东聊城,聊城市人民医院急诊科
作者简介:郭爱清(1974—),女,本科,聊城市人民医院主管护师。
通讯作者:袁小菊(1976—),女,本科,聊城市人民医院主管护师,guo1974@163.com。
The Influence of Detailed Nursing on Nursing Satisfaction among Emergency Department Patients
Guo Aiqing,Yan Sulei, Yuan Xiaoju
Abstract: Objective To study the influence of detailed nursing on the nursing satisfaction among emergency department patients and to sum up nursing experience. Methods 1785 patients from June 2013 to December 2013 were selected before the implementation of detailed nursing as the control group; 1910 patients were selected from June 2014 to December 2014 were selected after the implementation of detailed nursing as the observation group; emergency acceptance, reception attitude and nursing strategy were improved, and at the same time psychological support toward patients were paid special attention. Results Nursing attitude, nursing service, health education toward patients, patientsrsquo; safety assessment in the observation group were higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P lt; 0.05), the accuracy of assigning patients to respective departments of the control group (1482/1785) is lower than the observation group (1842/1910), the difference was statistically significant (=183.83,P=0.00<0.05) The emergency residence time (2.2 + 0.4) h in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (2 + 0.4) h, the difference was statistically significant (t=1
文档评论(0)