急性腹泻重视程度及其相关影响因素调查.docVIP

精品论文 参考文献 急性腹泻重视程度及其相关影响因素调查 刘适春（广州医学院第一附属医院老年干部保健二区 510120） 【中图分类号】R181.3 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1672-5085 (2011)01-0103-03 【摘要】 目的 对急性腹泻的重视程度进行调查，明确目前大众对腹泻的重视程度及其相关影响因素。方法 对入住我院的病思捌浼沂艄?10人进行开放式调查，调查内容包括半年内是否有急性腹泻史、处理方式；同时对首选寻求正规医疗帮助的腹泻者（RM组）与非首选正规医疗者（NRM组）的一般资料进行比较，寻找影响腹泻者对腹泻处理方式的可能因素。结果 在受调查的人群中半年内有急性腹泻发生率为87.3%（96人），共发生急性腹泻142次，其中首选RM、NRM的分别占28.9％、71.1％。RM组及NRM组一般资料中年龄、是否居民、个人收入比例组间差异有统计学意义。结论 大众半年内急性腹泻发生率极高，而大部分未寻求正规的诊疗，其中年龄、收入是决定人们处理方式的主要因素，故应加强基础医疗的投入，提高大众对小病的正规诊治意识。 【关键词】 急性腹泻 处理方式 调查 影响因素 年龄 收入 Survival on public attitude towards the acute diarrhea and its related impact factors Liu Shi-chun (Second District of Department of Elderly cadres health care, first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510120) 【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the publican attitudes towards acute diarrhea and its impact factors. Methods Open-survey was carried out in our hospitals patients and their families (total 110 cases), which consisted of the history of acute diarrhea within six months and their treatment towards acute diarrhea. As to find out the possible treatment-related impact factors, The characteristics of those who preferred to seeking regular medical help（RM group）were compared with those that did not（non-regular medical therapeutic group, NRM group）. Results The incident rate of acute diarrhea in respondents was 87.3% (96/110) within half a year. Among respondents with acute diarrhea, 28.9% preferred RM and 71.1% preferred NRM. There were significantly differences between RM group and NRM group in age, resident and personal incomes. Conclusion Although the public incident rate of acute diarrhea is high, most of them do not treat with formal medical intervention. Age, incomes are main factors that determine people attitudes towards acute diarrhea. Hence, itrsquo;s time for us to strengthen basic health inputs and increase public awareness of formal medical diagnosis and treatment of minor illnesses. 【Key words】 Acu