Developing the New Qualitative Measurement Indicator and its Application in Scientific Papers研究.pdf

下载文档 降价啦

0
0
约2.12万字
约 9页
2018-01-14 发布于广东
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

Developing the New Qualitative Measurement Indicator and its Application in Scientific Papers研究.pdf

1、本文档共9页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

China．USABusinessReview．ISSN 1537-1514 March2013，Vo1．12，No．3，322—330 酋 LI舞it,4INeat DevelopingtheNewQualitativeMeasurementIndicatorandits ApplicationinScientificPapers Yong—JeongKim，DongHoonOh KoreaInstituteofSTEvaluationandPlanning(KISTEP)，Seoul，Korea Thisarticleintroducesanew qualitativemeasurementindicator，theRelativelyRank-normalized ImpactFactor f尺 n thatcanovercomedrawbacksoftheexistingqualitativeindicators(JournalIF，normalizedIF)．The qualities0fSCIpapersinG7andBRICsareinvestigatedusingthisindicator．TheresultoftheR， analysisof m0secountriesshowsthattheUSproducesnotonlythelargestquantitybutalsothebestqualityofSCIpapers．The USistheresearchleaderinboth b“asicscience’’and “bio·science”．Th eUK alsoshowshighqualiyt inalmostall areas，evensuperiortotheUSinsomeresearchareassuchaspharmacologyandtoxicology，molecularbiologyand genetics．etc．．OverallthequalitativestatusofscientificpapersinallBRIC countriesarenotyetuptopar，although theyhayeachievedaquantitativeexpansionofpublications．Howeverin “engineering”Chinaisthesecondonlyto theUSinioumalquality．脚 w。rdsscientiffcpaper，qualitativemeasurementindicat。r，RelativelyRank-normalizedImpactFactor(R2nlF)， JournalImpactFactor，G7，BRIC IntrOducti0n The obiective measurementofresearch performance isan important topic in the evaluation and establishmentofSTpolicies．Thequalityofscientificpapersisingeneralthemostfundamentalmeansof measuringresearchperfomr ance．However．measuringresearchperformanceisnotaseasya itaPPeas，andits improperusecanbequitemisleading． Certain1v．theactualnumberofcitationswouldprovideabetterperformanceindicator．However，thisis notordinarilyposs