- 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
纸塑铝复合材料和聚乙烯材料作为牛奶包装的LCA比较研究
纸塑铝复合材料和聚乙烯材料作为牛奶包装的LCA比较研究
摘 要:的97%,其中化石燃料影响最大占60%。环境影响阶段比较得出原料获取阶段的环境影响在整个生命周期阶段,纸塑铝复合包装占处置阶段之前的81%,而聚乙烯包装为90%关键词:LCA,,,
LCA applied to Milk Package made from Paper-PE-Al Complex and Polythene
Abstract: In this study, the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for the comparison of two milk packages, from Paper-PE-Al complex and polythene, is presented. The input and output streams of mass and energy are examined and the environmental impacts associated with the two systems are analyzed. The application of LCA by using Eco-Indicator 99 has made possible the comparison of the environmental impacts of two milk packages. The results of this LCA study are discussed and reveal that the value of environmental impact about composite package and plastic package are 6.83Pt and 6.73Pt separately, which of environmental impact in raw materials stage is the highest of all life cycle, account for 81% and 90% separately of whole life cycle except treatment stage. The Paper-PE-Al composite package contribute more to Land Use, Resp. Inorganics impact and Fossil Fuels, while plastic package contribute more to Fossil Fuels impact which is two times as complex package. However, Paper-PE-Al composite package has more environmental impact because it has not been well recovered and reused, which environmental impact can be decreased by increasing recovery ratio and developing technology of separation and reuse for Al-PE complex.
Keywords: LCA, Paper-PE-Al complex, polythene, milk package
文档评论(0)