Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication：研究，评估师，和沟通.doc

下载文档

1
0
约1.79万字
约 6页
2018-03-02 发布于重庆
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication：研究，评估师，和沟通.doc

1、本文档共6页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication：研究，评估师，和沟通

Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication: Evaluation Workshop – September 29, 2003 Connie Kubo Della-Piana The Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication held the second of three workshops designed to develop a picture of the current state and future of educational research, evaluation, and communication in STEM education and the current and potential role of REC in those pursuits. Expert practitioners and recognized scholars in the field of program evaluation were invited to reflect on the current state of evaluation and to speculate about the future. Four sets of questions guided the day-long discussion. The first question focused on trends and future directions. The second question asked the panelists to describe areas in which creative work was being done currently and to speculate where opportunities for creative work have been missed. Next, panelists discussed the three or four areas in evaluation in which substantial progress had not been made and three or four areas in which there had been a reasonable accumulation of knowledge. Lastly, panelists were asked to submit written responses discussing opportunities and the major obstacles and threats to the progress and accumulation of knowledge in evaluation, particularly in STEM education, and how these opportunities and impediments could be addressed. The discussion ended with a set of recommendations for REC on next steps. This report provides a brief summary of the written responses of the expert panel and discussions of the issues raised in the papers without specific reference to STEM education. The summary is broken down into three topics: Contributions, shortfalls and challenges, and new foci and opportunities. The first section provides an overview of the summary. The next sections present extended descriptions and discussions of the topics. Overview Contributions. The field of evaluation has made major contributions to applied social and behavioral science research in fo