诉讼欺诈行为定性探讨.doc

摘要： 随着社会文明的提高和法律精神的贯彻，诉讼成为了人们用以解决民事纠纷，捍卫自身合法权益的主要手段和途径，但是同时诉讼也被有些人拿来作为谋取不正当利益的手段。这种为获得非法利益，不惜在诉讼中使用非法手段致使法院作出错误判决的诉讼欺诈行为，不仅破坏了司法活动正常秩序、浪费司法资源、损害司法公信力，同时又给他人财产权益造成了损害。诉讼欺诈行为的犯罪本质是明显的，所以增设明确的法定刑予以规制是罪刑法定原则的内在要求，也是建设法制社会完善法律体系的基本需要。所以本文通过诉讼欺诈的定性分析，揭示其犯罪的本质和严重的社会危害性，并以立法角度提出设立“诉讼欺诈罪”的建议，以求有效地遏制诉讼欺诈行为的发生，从根本上解决目前对此无法可依的问题。 关键词：诉讼欺诈 刑法规制 司法机关 公私财产 Abstract: With the improvement of social civilization and carry out the spirit of law, litigation as the people to solve civil disputes, to protect their legal rights and interests of the main means and ways, but at the same time litigation was also some people intended as seek improper interests means. This for gain illegal benefits, regardless of the lawsuit using illegal methods in the court to make a wrong judgment of litigation fraud, not only damaged the normal order of the judicial activities, waste judicial resources, damage the judicial credibility, and at the same time, property rights to others to cause damage. Litigation fraud crime essence is obvious, so add clear legal punishment to the principle of a legally prescribed punishment regulation is the internal demand, is also the construction of social legal system to improve the legal system of basic needs. So this paper through the litigation fraud qualitative analysis, reveals the essence of his crime and the serious social harmfulness, and put forward the legislation to establish a \litigation fraud\ advice, in order to effectively curb the litigation fraud occurs, fundamentally solve the problem of this lawless. Key words:Litigation fraud Criminal law regulation Judicial authority Public or private property 诉讼欺诈行为定性探讨 案例一 深圳市某实业公司诉深圳市某投资公司借款纠纷案在该案中，被告投资公司承认借款事实，并与原告达成调解协议，约定被告将其位于深圳市宝安区龙华镇三联村的25823平方米土地使用权转让到原告名下以偿还借款900万元。一审法院根据双方签订的“调解协议”内容，制作了民事调解书。再审认为，被告另有大量债务，但除了在原民事调解书中被告用于抵偿给原告的土地使用权外，被告未举证证实其尚有其他财产足以清偿本案之外的其他债务。故被告将上述土地使用权全部抵偿给原告，损害了其他债权人的利益，因此，民事调解书应予撤销。以浙江省为例，据不完全统计，截至2008年5月份，已经审理确认属于虚假诉讼、诉讼的案件达107件，实际数量应远不止如此。/a/caipanbaogao/2010072