Criterion-Based Evaluation Initiative (CBEI) Update基于标准的评估（cbei）更新.pptVIP

Q A: CBEI Wording in Narratives A: The authors of the MSPE will add information to each narrative to indicate whether a student’s performance met criteria for PWD in each domain. Clerkship directors do not need to specifically mention Pass with Distinction in the narrative. See the next slide for examples. MSPE format Q A: Concerns Q: I have concerns about a student. He responded to mid-clerkship feedback and deserves to pass the rotation – but I worry that he will have difficulty in future rotations and beyond. Should I mention the concerns I had in the formative section? Q A: Concerns A: Yes. The Committee on Performance, Professionalism, and Promotion (CP3) relies on information in both the formative and summative narratives in monitoring student progress. Although formative comments are not included in the MSPE, they are helpful to CP3 as a formal documentation of concerns. Concerns The final evaluation form includes a confidential question to allow clerkship directors to report concerns about student performance. These flags are viewed by Advising Deans, Educators for CARE faculty, and the Director of Clerkship Education. They serve as tool for identifying trends in student performance.. Confidential concerns are not seen by students and not reflected any where in the MSPE. Updated for 2012-13 Resources For more information on narrative evaluations, including guidance as to whether information should be formative or summative and suggestions for framing “negative” ideas, contact: Jen Deitz (jdeitz@) Elizabeth Stuart (aestuart@) Appeals  Appeals Some students will appeal their final clerkship grades and/or the content of their narrative evaluations. Appeals According to the SOM policy on evaluation appeals, the process begins with a discussion between the student and the clerkship director or Advising Dean. Unresolved disagreements are referred to the Clerkship Evaluations Committee. See MD Program Handbook for additional details. App