Multicommodity Rent or Buy Approximation Via Cost Sharing多品种租金或购买通过成本分担的近似.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约5.5千字
约 41页
2018-04-12 发布于江西
举报
版权申诉

Multicommodity Rent or Buy Approximation Via Cost Sharing多品种租金或购买通过成本分担的近似.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Multicommodity Rent or Buy Approximation Via Cost Sharing多品种租金或购买通过成本分担的近似.ppt

Multicommodity Rent or Buy:Approximation Via Cost Sharing Martin Pál Joint work with Anupam Gupta Amit Kumar Tim Roughgarden Steiner Forest and Rent or Buy Related Work Cost Sharing for Steiner Forest Cost Sharing for Steiner Forest What does (P3) say What does (P3) say The Rent or Buy Algorithm Analysis Analysis (2) Analysis (3) Existing Steiner forest algorithms Existing Steiner forest algorithms Existing Steiner forest algorithms Existing Steiner forest algorithms Existing Steiner forest algorithms Existing Steiner forest algorithms Existing Steiner forest algorithms How to define cost shares Does it work? Does it work? Does it work? Does it work? Does it work? Solution Works on our example Works on our example Works on our example Works on our example How to prove (P3) How to prove (P3) How to prove (P3) How to prove (P3) How to prove (P3) Mapping of layers Mapping not one to one Not all layers of D run cross P Open problems Need to compare runs on D and D’ = D ? {si, ti} Idea: 1. pick a {si, ti} path P in G/ FD 2. Show that ?(D’,i) accounts for a constant fraction of length(P) Need to compare runs on D and D’ = D ? {si, ti} Idea: 1. pick a {si, ti} path P in G/ FD 2. Show that ?(D’,i) accounts for a constant fraction of length(P) Instead of ?(D’,i), use alone(i), the total time si or ti was alone in its cluster Need to compare runs on D and D’ = D ? {si, ti} Idea: 1. pick a {si, ti} path P in G/ FD 2. Show that ?(D’,i) accounts for a constant fraction of length(P) Need to compare runs on D and D’ = D ? {si, ti} Idea: 1. pick a {si, ti} path P in G/ FD 2. Show that ?(D’,i) accounts for a constant fraction of length(P) Need to compare runs on D and D’ = D ? {si, ti} Idea: 1. pick a {si, ti} path P in G/ FD 2. Show that ?(D’,i) accounts for a constant fraction of length(P) ?(D’, ), = 2.5 alone( ) = 2.0 Lonely layer: generated by si or ti while the only active demand in its cluster Each non-lonely layer in the D’ run maps to ? layers in the scaled