法律解释的困境与出路分析——德国法律解释主观说与-中国政法大学.PDFVIP

法律解释的困境与出路分析 ——德国法律解释主观说与客观说之争 孙莹 摘要 在法律实务中需要进行法律解释时，常常会因解释标准选取的不同 而使一个法律条文产生不同意思的解释，进而可能会产生不同的判决结 果。不同的解释标准的选取实质上是因对法律解释目的的认识不同而产 生的，这也是德国方法论中主观说与客观说两种学说的本质区别。本文 在介绍德国主观说和客观说的理论基础上试图通过剖析两种学说背后的 价值立场，结合实际案例和中国司法现状，对两种学说进行折中，得出 实践中应以实现实质的公平正义为最终目标，针对不同的具体情况对法 律解释方法采取不同的标准的结论。 关键词：法律解释 主观说 客观说 解释方法 公平正义 The Dilemma and Outlet of Legal Interpretation ——The Choice between Subjective Theory and Objective Theory Abstract When legal interpretation is needed in judicial practice, explanations with different meanings are likely to be given for a same legal provision due to the different selections of interpretation standards, which may lead to different judgments. How to choose interpretation standards, essentially, depends mainly on the understanding of the goal of legal interpretation, which is also the essential difference between subjective theory and objective theory in German legal methodology. Based on the theoretical basis of subjective theory and objective theory, this paper will analyze the value points behind the two theories. Simultaneously, this paper aims to make a balance between the two theories through the discussion of practice cases as well as the current judicial status in china. Conclusions can be drawn that substantial fairness and justice should be the ultimate goal in judicial practice, and different standards of legal interpretation should be chosen for various specific conditions. Key Words ： legal interpretation subjective theory objective theory means of interpretation fairness and justice 目 录 绪论 1 一、法律解释的两难境地：从实例切入 3 （一）“安乐死”案件对法律解释的挑战 3 （二）教会违反《禁止通过契约输入外国移民法》案对法律解释的挑战 ... 3 （三）房屋合建行为对法律解释的挑战4 二、相关