临床预防技术（中山大学）sealants.pptxVIP

Pit-and-fissure sealants;Pit and fissure sealants were first reported byCueto and Buonocore1 in 1967 and are widelyrecommended and used in dentistry today.;Dental caries in pit and fissures of children;Susceptibility of Dental caries in pit and fissures;Anatomy of occlusal surfaces;Development of dental caries on pit and fissures;History of prevention ;History of pit and fissure sealant ;Indications for use of sealants;Indications for use of sealants;Components of sealants;Acid-etch technique;Acid-etch technique;Clinical procedures;Clinical procedures;Clinical procedures;Clinical procedures;Clinical procedures;Clinical procedures;Clinical procedures;Clinical effectiveness;Clinical effectiveness;Other informations related to clinical effectiveness;Systematic evaluation of clinical effectiveness;Systematic evaluation of clinical effectiveness;Clinical effectiveness of glass ionomer (GIC) sealants;Clinical effectiveness of glass ionomer (GIC) sealants;Longevity of materials;Longevity of materials;CONCLUSIONS VERSUS SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that resin-based sealants can be recommended for clinical use. The faster and less error-prone clinical application of light-polymerizing materials, however, makes them the preferred choice for daily dental practice. ;PLoS One.?2013 Oct 23;8(10):e77103. Validity of?sealant?retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic?review.RESULTS:The risk of loss of complete retention of?sealant?materials was associated with the risk of caries occurrence for resin but not for GIC based?sealants. The difference between RCR values of the two?sealanttypes was statistically significant (p0.05). The null-hypothesis was rejected.CONCLUSIONS:The current clinical evidence suggests that complete retention of?pit and fissure sealantsmay not be a valid surrogate endpoint for caries prevention as its clinical endpoint. Further research is required to corroborate the current results. ;Systematic evaluation