城市公共空间现状调查研究-风景园林专业论文 word格式.docx

AbstractUrbanpublicspaceisanimportantsocialplacesinthecity,it’sspatialqualityaffects peoplesqualityofpubliclife.Inthedesignofurbanpublicspace,weshouldfollowthe principlesofscientific,rationalandhumane,inordertocreateahigh-qualitypublicspace forpeople. Theinvestigationisthe cornerstoneofthedesign,andplaysanimportantrolefor improvingthescientificandfeasibilityofthedesign.Buttherearemanyproblemsinthe investigationofurbanpublicspace.Itcan’tgettrueandreliablefindingsthatshowits importance.Inthiscontext,thispaperanalyzestheproblemsandcausesoftheinvestigation ofurbanpublicspace,andthenconductedin-depthanalysisintherepartsthatarethe classificationoftheinvestigation content,theinterpretation standardsoftheinformation and thechoiceofinvestigationmethods,standingonthedockingpointofinvestigationand design.Theinvestigationcontentisdividedintothreecategories,suchasmaterialelements, culturalelementsandtheelementsoftheactivity.Therearethreecriteriainthe interpretationoftheinformation,suchas humane,toencouragesocial interactionand equalityandculturalconnotations.Inthechoiceoftheinvestigationmethods,theauthor distinguishesbetweendesign-investigationmethodsandstudy-investigationmethods,and pickedthedesign-investigationmethodsas themethodsofthedesignofurbanpublicspace. Atlast,theauthorbuildthesystemoftheinvestigationofurbanpublicspace.Thesystem includestheleveloftheinvestigation,theframeworkoftheinvestigation,thecontentofthe investigationandthebasicstepsoftheinvestigation.Theinnovationofthispaperisthattheinvestigationsystemstandsonthepractical pointofview,andtheultimateaimistoproposeainvestigationsystemthatcan beusedin thedesignofurbanpublicspace.Thisdeterminesthatthepaperpayalotattentiontothe feasibilityandefficiencyoftheinvestigation.Therefore,whetherintheanalysisofthe content,theinterpretationstandardsoftheinformationortheselectionoftheinvestigation methods,bothtoavoidtheendlesspursuitofaccuracy,breadthanddepth,buttofinda balancebetweenaccuracyandefficiency.Itisadifferenttotheresear