网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

第十七条第二项第二十二条第二项第二十三条第二项.ppt

第十七条第二项第二十二条第二项第二十三条第二项.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
第十七条第二项第二十二条第二项第二十三条第二项

事實 Dr. Fischer, a radiologist, injected the contrast medium into the calves of both of Tracys legs, because he was unable to find a vein which he could use. The package insert, which contained the manufacturers directions for injecting the contrast medium, recommended that the contrast medium be injected into the gluteal muscles (buttocks). Dr. Fischer had read articles in medical journals which warned against making intramuscular injections into the buttocks or thighs especially in tiny children, because possible nerve and muscle damage could result. That is why Dr. Fischer chose to inject the contrast medium into the calves of Tracys legs, because, after the buttocks and the thighs, they were the next largest muscle mass away from the trunk of the body. “A short while (four months later) after being discharged from the hospital Tracy began to have trouble with her right leg. Her leg was stiff and her heel began to lift off the ground. Tracys problem was later diagnosed as a shortening of the achilles tendon, which May have been precipitated by some kind of trauma to her ankle or calf muscle. After two operations and other expensive treatment, including the wearing of a leg brace, Tracys problem was substantially corrected. 事實 The jury returned a favorable verdict to all the defendants the Brooks appealed on eight issues: 1. Whether the verdict of the jury in favor of Dr. Guy E. Ross and Dr. Lawrence Allen was contrary to law; 2. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to give plaintiffs tendered instruction No. 5 to the jury; 3. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to give plaintiffs tendered instruction No. 1 to the jury. 4. Whether the trial court erred in giving Dr. Rosss instructions Nos. 2, 3, and 4 to the jury; 5. Whether the trial court erred in giving Dr. Fischers instructions Nos. 4 and 5; 6. Whether the trial court erred in granting St. Johns *273 Hickey Memorial Hospitals motion for judgment on the evidence; 7. Whether the trial court erre

文档评论(0)

sunshaoying + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档